Government’s Acquisition of Cell-site Records is a Search Under the Fourth Amendment
[embeddoc url=”http://daiglelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/United-States-Supreme-Court-Carpenter-v-United-States.pdf” download=”all”]
[embeddoc url=”http://daiglelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/United-States-Supreme-Court-Carpenter-v-United-States.pdf” download=”all”]
On June 22, 2018 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Carpenter v. United States (No. 16- 402), 585 US ____ (2018), holding that when the Government obtains access to historical cell-phone records that provide a chronicle of
On June 18, 2018 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach (No. 17-21), 585 US ____ (2018), holding that the existence of probable cause for an arrest, does not bar a First
[embeddoc url=”http://daiglelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Lozman-v.-City-of-Riviera-Beach-Florida.pdf” download=”all”]
This week, the Supreme Court of United States issued its decision Byrd v. United States (No. 16-1371), 584 US ___ (2018). This is an important case for law enforcement in terms of vehicle searches. The issue before the Court was
[embeddoc url=”http://daiglelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/SCOTUS-Vehicle-Searches-Unauthorized-Drivers-of-Rental-Cars-Could-Have-Reasonable-Expectation-of-Privacy-in-the-Vehicle.pdf” download=”all”]
[embeddoc url=”http://daiglelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/scotus-kisela-v-hughes.pdf” download=”all”]
SCOTUS Rules for Police Officer in Excessive Force Case Continue Reading »
This week the Supreme Court of United States decided Kisela v. Hughes, 584 US ____ (2018), and the opinion is already the center of a debate. In this case, not only did the majority find that Officer Kisela was entitled
SCOTUS Rules for Police Officer in Excessive Force Case Continue Reading »
[embeddoc url=”http://daiglelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/SCOTUS-Hate-Speech-and-other-important-1st-amendment-updates.pdf” download=”all”]
On June 19th, 2017, the United States Supreme Court reached two important conclusions in terms of the First Amendment. In Matal v.Tam, 581 U.S. ____ (2017), the Supreme Court provided a useful definition of what a hate speech is as